In 1987, a researcher in Australia recorded a male musk duck named Ripper producing a vocalization that sounded very much like “You bloody fool,” along with sounds resembling a slamming door and a soft mumbling. A second duck in the region was recorded in 2000 imitating a Pacific black duck’s call. Both recordings survived, but they were never analyzed in any detail, and most of the accompanying records were destroyed in a wildfire that swept through the Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve in 2003.
Now retired, that original researcher, Peter J. Fullagar, has teamed up with Carel ten Cate, a biologist at Leiden University in the Netherlands, to perform the first in-depth analysis of those recordings. That analysis confirmed that Ripper’s distinctive vocalizations are indeed a form of mimicry—likely the first comprehensively documented example of musk ducks being able to mimic sounds. The researchers described their findings in a new paper published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, part of a special issue on vocal learning in animals and humans.
Definitions of what constitutes so-called vocal-production learning can vary, but if an animal reared in isolation produces vocalizations that deviate sharply from what is typical of the species or is able to imitate the sounds of other species, those are deemed evidence for the phenomenon. Vocal-production learning is critical to human speech and language development, but there have only been a handful of confirmed reports of this in animal species—most notably, whales, dolphins, bats, elephants, songbirds, parrots, and hummingbirds.
Musk ducks derive their name from the pungent scent produced by the males during mating season. Males are generally up to three times larger than the females and sport a large, black lobe below the bill that can be in either a flaccid or “turgid” state. Male mating displays can involve raising and lowering tails and kicking sideways and backward with the feet to produce large splashes in the water. Males have also been known to produce whistling vocalizations and flaunt their turgid lobes to attract females. Musk ducks are the only living member of their particular genus and are only distantly related to other birds capable of mimicking sounds with their vocalizations.
The males are so aggressive that musk ducks are rarely bred in captivity, but Ripper was an exception. He was hatched from an egg in September 1983 in the Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve southwest of Canberra. A foster hen performed brooding duties for the egg, but after hatching, Ripper was raised and fed by human handlers in isolation.
When he was a few weeks old, Ripper was moved to a small pond with other captive-reared waterfowl and was later kept in a small pen concealed from public view by shrubbery. According to the authors, this pen was divided into two spaces, connected by holes below the water level. Two female ducks from another reserve could fit through the holes, but Ripper could not. The females were in the adjoining space when Ripper produced his legendary vocalizations.
Fullagar recorded Ripper with a Sony Walkman Professional cassette recorder and Sennheiser MKH 816 microphone on July 19 and 26, 1987, when the musk duck was 4 years old. The vocalizations included a slamming-door sound (whuk whuk whuk) mimicking the opening and closing of a double-hung spring door near where Ripper was kept in the first few weeks after hatching. Sometimes the slamming-door sound was followed by a soft mumble that sounded speech-like but with no discernible words. The most interesting vocalization sounded like Ripper was saying, “You bloody fool!”—recorded when Fullagar was nearby “because that was the way to enrage [Ripper] into display,” the authors wrote.
The recordings were preserved at the Australian National Wildlife Collection but remained unnoticed by researchers for decades until ten Cate heard about them. “When I read it at first I thought, ‘It’s a hoax, it can’t be true,’” ten Cate told The Guardian. “But it turned out to be true.”
Fullagar also recorded another male duck in June 2000. (Recording technology news had advanced by then; Fullagar used a Sony TCD-10 PRO DAT recorder to capture the sounds for posterity.) This male had been raised by a captive female musk duck in the same reserve and at some point had been exposed to Ripper. Perhaps that’s why the vocalizations included a sound similar to Ripper’s slamming door vocalization, followed by a whistle.
Fullagar and ten Cate received two other personal accounts concerning unusual vocalizations by male musk ducks in the UK, but no recordings exist, so these accounts cannot be confirmed. One duck would cough and snort “like a pony”—yes, a pony lived nearby—and occasionally attempted a “hello” upon seeing the gardener. The other reportedly could mimic the distinctive cough of his bird keeper, as well as the squeak of a turnstile.
‘Here’s Your Bloody Food’
Real Life. Real News. Real Action
Zillion Things Mobile!Read More-Visit US
For their analysis, Fullagar and ten Cate created sonograms for the various vocalizations produced by Ripper and the second Australian duck. The sonograms of the duck vocalizations closely matched those for the mimicked sounds—including a human male saying, “You bloody fool,” although ten Cate told The Guardian it’s possible the last word may be “food.” Per ten Cate, “I can imagine that the caretaker would jokingly say, ‘Here’s your bloody food.'” And Ripper learned to mimic the statement accordingly.
“Together with earlier observations of vocal differences between populations and deviant vocalizations in captive-reared individuals, these observations demonstrate the presence of advanced vocal learning at a level comparable to that of songbirds and parrots,” the authors concluded. That’s significant because it likely represents “a case of independent evolution.”
As to why the musk duck might have this unusual ability, the authors suggest it might have something to do with the fact that musk ducks produce only a few offspring at a time, and they rely on the mother for feeding until they are almost fully grown. That means much longer social contact with the mother duck, along with the usual imprinting that typically occurs.
“An isolated hand-reared musk duck, such as Ripper, most likely forms a strong attachment to a human caretaker,” the authors wrote. Furthermore, “The long period of dependency might also be accompanied by a more gradual development of neural systems, providing the scope for a larger impact of experience (learning) on behavioral development.”
This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.
More Great WIRED Stories
- 📩 The latest on tech, science, and more: Get our newsletters!
- Can robots evolve into machines of loving grace?
- 3D printing helps ultracold quantum experiments go small
- How community pharmacies stepped up during Covid
- The Artful Escape is psychedelic perfection
- How to send messages that automatically disappear
- 👁️ Explore AI like never before with our new database
- 🎮 WIRED Games: Get the latest tips, reviews, and more
- 📱 Torn between the latest phones? Never fear—check out our iPhone buying guide and favorite Android phones
Subscribe to the newsletter news
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe